How to deal with LRUD data?
John Halleck
John.Halleck at utah.edu
Tue Feb 15 15:20:41 GMT 2005
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Martin Sluka wrote:
> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:01:29 +0100
> From: Martin Sluka <martinsluka at mac.com>
> To: survex at survex.com
> Subject: Re: How to deal with LRUD data?
>
> At 08:13 -0500 14.2.2005, Philip Balister wrote:
> *******************************************
>
> >1) LRUD is a station attribute, not a shot attribute. So the LRUD data
> >is unique to the station.
>
> There is very common situation in 3D modeling of cave one needs two
> different LRUD sets on one station - typicaly if the point is just at
> beginning of small passage going from large room. Which LRUD is
> correct in such a case - the LRUD 0.5 0.0 0.6 0.0 or LRUD 8 15 22 1
In the LBCC data format we used "/" to mark transitions at points.
For the case you give we would have had:
LRUD 0.5/8 0.0/15 0.6/22 0.0/1
Although it was more common to see just one /ed.
Of course, that was 25 years ago... amazing to see how much
progress has been made in the mean time. :)
> ???
> One may solve this by several "dirty" tricks - "zero shots", dividing
> of shots if 3D modeling, ... - bit this is not very correct from the
> of view point of theory of surveying.
I think you mean theory of modeling.
> So the LRUD should not be ONLY the station attribute, but the
> attribute of shot too - in that case you may use two sets of LRUD for
> one point, each one connected to different shot, or you may use LRUD
> not only in the points but in any place on shot (the laser disto is
> very helpfull in such situation).
Here I think you've hit the nail on the head as to what the issue is.
But that's my personal opinion.
> Martin Sluka
> --
>
> --
> Survex http://lists.survex.com/mailman/listinfo/survex
>
More information about the Survex
mailing list