[spud] doxygen

[Robert Smallshire]

I think doxygen would definitely be the way to go. I've been assessing it
for use at work and it looks superb. I'm definitely planning on using it for
new stuff. I also happen to know that Cisco are using it for all their
coding documentation.

Rob.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: survex-admin@survex.com [mailto:survex-admin@survex.com]On Behalf
> Of Mark Shinwell
> Sent: 31 October 2000 16:30
> To: Survex list
> Subject: [spud] doxygen
>
>
>
> The doxygen system (www.doxygen.org) has just come to my attention.
> It provides a nice way of producing source code documentation with
> minimal hassle.
>
> I am strongly in favour of something like this being used for Spud
> [having seen what happens with large projects with no documentation...]
> This is going to be especially important to enable other coders to
> write plugins, and will be useful for the main developers.
>
> What do people think about using doxygen?  I believe the KDE people are
> about to switch to using it, so it must be fairly decent.
>
> Mark
>
> --
> Mark Shinwell -- http://mrs30.quns.cam.ac.uk -- Mark.Shinwell@cl.cam.ac.uk
> Theory and Semantics Group, University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory
>
>
> --
> Survex http://lists.survex.com/mailman/listinfo/survex
>
>