LRUD (was Re: Survex digest, Vol 1 #136 - 3 msgs)
David Doolin
doolin@cs.utk.edu
Thu, 2 Aug 2001 10:28:27 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Olly Betts wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 11:29:58AM -0400, Richard Knapp wrote:
> > LRUD are dependant on a shot but there are three ways they can be taken:
> >
> > - perpendicular to next;
> > - perpendicular to last;
> > - average between last and next.
>
> There's more than that - for instance, some people take them "across the
> passage". Roughly speaking this means that the L/R line is perpendicular to
[]
> But in the interests of having something to implement, if you're going to
> pick one allowed style then LRUD readings at stations along the leg bisector
> is the one to go for. Others can be added later once the simplest case is
> working.
One more comment, then I promise to shut up.
For the internal implementation, it would probably be easiest
to implement the simplest, *mathematically unique* representation.
For the previous example of geological orientation data,
internally everything is dip/dip direction since this
uniquely defines a plane in 2 coordinates by its pole.
(Which means I can compute orientation tensors etc .
immediately.) But no one else needs to know this... they
just enter their favorite format and it just works.
(At one point I had this running as an applet [ca. 1996].
But I haven't actually seen the code in years...)
-dmd
>
> Cheers,
> Olly
>
>
> --
> Survex http://lists.survex.com/mailman/listinfo/survex
>